Friday, November 5, 2010

St. Ignatius of Loyola-- A Biography

“There are very few people who realize what God would make of them if they abandoned themselves into his hands, and let themselves be formed by his grace”
– St. Ignatius of Loyola            
            The above quote cannot more accurately and adequately describe the life of St. Ignatius of Loyola. A man fervently devoted to the Lord through potent prayer, humble service, and ceaseless vigor for God’s greater glory, Ignatius directly and explicitly inspired others to come to know the Lord—even today his Company of Jesus, the Jesuit Order, remains arguably the most influential Catholic religious order in the world.
            Ińigo de Loyola was born on December 24, 1491, in Azpeitia, a Basque province in northern Spain. Ińigo, the youngest of twelve children, illustriously lived a youthful and passionate life as an early adolescent, concerning himself with swordplay, gambling, and womanizing, while engaging in vain activities such as hair-grooming, nail clipping, and lavish bathing.
As a faithful Spaniard, Ińigo’s father sent him to learn discipline, obedience, and prudence under the watch of Juan Velasquez—a governor of King Ferdinand of Spain. Eager to express his zeal and masculinity to gain glory, Ińigo enlisted in the Spanish military and found battle quickly against the French while earning for himself accolades and respect amongst his peers. Ińigo’s dreams for eternal glory changed with a sudden chain of events.
            While engaging in battle against an overwhelming French army at Pamplona in 1521, a cannonball struck Ińigo in the legs. One leg was completely broken, and the other was also damaged. Although the French handily defeated the Spanish, the commanding French officers ordered for the courteous treatment of the gallant injured Spanish soldiers—this included Ińigo. Eventually, by the kindness of French Colonel Andre de Foix, Ińigo returned back to Azpeitia, where his leg refused to heal correctly.
Disgruntled and disheartened that his eternal glory to serve as a personal soldier for the king of Spain was indefinitely halted, Ińigo insisted that his leg be re-broken to hasten the healing process and maintain his prideful egotistical self-centricity. Simultaneously, to pass the time, Ińigo requested literature from his sister-in-law. She gave him the only two books in the house—The Lives of the Saints and The Life of Our Savior. Displeased, he asked her if she had Amadus of Gaul, a popular romantic book about knights and their valorous deeds, and she again replied that those were the only two books in the house. She left the books next to his bedside. It was not for days until Ińigo caved and began to read.
 At first, Ińigo read almost against his will. But, once finished, he read the books again—and again! Each time Ińigo read them with more interest, excitement, and peaked sensitivity. He read intently about St. Francis Assisi, St. Dominic, St. Paul, St. Stephen, and others while finding one pervading and encompassing theme—these saints lived lives as soldiers for Christ and engaged in exciting and daring adventures. The more he read, the more Ińigo its on st ignatius though and im only to the part where he has read the 2 books about the saints and christ saw himself as a saint, serving Jesus Christ to the ends of the earth. It was at this point that Ińigo began to refer to himself as Ignatius after the early church father St. Ignatius of Antioch—a martyr for the Christian faith and inspiration to Ińigo. its on st ignatius though and im only to the part where he has read the 2 books about the saints and christ
After anesthesia-less surgery to repair his broken and sluggishly-healing leg, Ignatius sought Confession from Fr. Jean Chanon, a well-reputed Benedictine monk who lived near a Shrine at Montserrat. Ignatius’s confession lasted three straight days. After confession, Ignatius committed and dedicated his life for the greater glory of God. “I have lain awake at night and thought only of how best I could serve God. I am happy in no other thought. I wish to do nothing else,” Ignatius confided to Fr. Chanon.
As Ignatius grew in his devoutness and piety, he developed and wrote the Spiritual Exercises— a way of understanding and living the human relationship with God in the world through personal Christo-centric meditations—in a cave near Manresa. The Spiritual Exercises form the cornerstone of contemporary Ignatian Spirituality and serve as distinct prayer focused on the life of Christ. The “Principle and Foundation” of the Exercises states, “Human beings are created to praise, reverence, and serve God… to save their souls.” This Ignatian Spirituality can be summed up by this phrase—“Finding God in all things.” Ignatius realized the particular importance of a sacra-mentality which invites a person to search for and find God in every circumstance of life.
This unique perspective of sacra-mentality drew praise and followers as well as caustic criticism. In particular, Ignatius faced charges of heresy and was imprisoned by the Spanish Inquisition. Fearing that Ignatius spread contradictions of the Catholic faith and did not recognize the pope as Christ’s vicar, the Inquisitor Don Alonso thoroughly questioned and viciously interrogated Ignatius on the grounds of faith and papal authority. Finally, Alonso confirmed, “I find nothing wrong with this man.”
While Ignatius gained a reputation for his piety and sincere devotion to the Lord and the Catholic Church, he began to gain followers. Some of the first followers of St. Ignatius included Bl. Peter Favre and St. Francis Xavier—men persuaded by the example of Ignatius’s zealous love for Christ. For example, Ignatius pestered Francis Xavier daily with the question, “What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul?” Slowly and surely Francis experienced metanoia, and agreed to join Ignatius’s Company. Ignatius of Loyola, Francis Xavier, and Peter Favre founded the Company of Jesus, men who pronounced poverty, chastity, and obedience to the Holy Father in Rome.
It was not until 1540 that Pope Paul III established and approved the “Society of Jesus.” At this, Ignatius called together all the Company, and voted for a Father General—the head of the Company. Ignatius received all votes except his own, and out of humility rejected the decision to lead the Company. So, a re-vote was issued, and yet again Ignatius received all votes except his own. Overwhelmed with humility and unworthiness to lead men, Ignatius sought the advice of his confessor. Finally, after three days once again in confession, Ignatius agreed and became the first Father General of the Society of Jesus.
St. Ignatius of Loyola died on July 31st, 1556, after having served fifteen years as Father General of the Society of Jesus. By the time of his death, the Jesuits had founded fifteen colleges in Spain, seventeen in Portugal, three in Germany, and two in France. Today there are over 13.5 thousand Jesuit priests in the world and over 50 Jesuit high schools or colleges in the United States alone.
Having attended a Jesuit high school, St. Ignatius High School in Cleveland, I have encountered the direct effects of St. Ignatius’s intentions for coming to know God in the world around me. I experienced, during my junior year in high school, the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius during a retreat. These intense and rigorous Exercises allowed me to delve into myself and find God’s presence all around me. A specific prayer I have come to personalize is named the Inner Room—a prayer where, in fact, a person imagines their own “room” and meets Jesus face-to-face there.
The paramount objective I took away from my Jesuit high school experience was living to be a Man for Others (a term coined in the 1970’s by Father General Fr. Pedro Arrupe, S.J.). I learned not to live for myself, but for God and others. Only by being a man for others would I become fully human. Only in this way can I live in the Spirit of Jesus Christ, who gave of himself for the salvation of the world, who was, above all, the Man for Others par excellence.
During his life, St. Ignatius of Loyola exemplified two main virtues. The first of these, obedience, is easily found in his persistent promulgation of faithfulness to the Catholic Church and the pope. His perpetual lesson was: "Sacrifice your own will and judgment to obedience. Whatever you do without the consent of your spiritual guide will be imputed to willfulness, not to virtue, though you were to exhaust your bodies by labors and austerities."
The second virtue, humility, pervades all of Ignatius’s prayers—for example in the Suscipe… “Take, Lord, and receive all my liberty, my memory, my understanding, and my entire will…” or in his Prayer for Generosity… “Lord, teach me to be generous. Teach me to serve you as you deserve. To give and not to count the cost…” Humility, the deprivation of pride, elevated St. Ignatius to such a beautiful model of faith. He is a saint of perseverance, a saint of hope, a saint of fiery passion for the Lord.

Take, O Lord, and receive my entire liberty, my memory, my understanding and my whole will. All that I am and all that I possess, You have given me: I surrender it all to You to be disposed of according to Your will. Give me only Your love and Your grace; with these I will be rich enough, and will desire nothing more.         
– St. Ignatius of Loyola

Saturday, October 30, 2010

Girls Tell Me I'm Funny: Jesus Tells Me to Love.

I love to laugh. It's a passion of mine. I need to find something funny in nearly every circumstance, or else the situation gets dull, boring, or even slightly morose-- and we all know how great of an experience it is to droll our minds to death. I crack jokes-- even if they lack a storming punchline. I tell puns, so well that sometimes I get like butter-- on a roll! But most of the time I use ironic, situational humor-- "...As opposed to..." punchlines. When I applied to the seminary last winter, one of the questions asked me to "finish the sentence." Evidently, the psychological aspect of seminary application tried to delve into my personal beliefs, values, and ideologies. For instance, they asked me to finish "my dad ________" or "my mom ______" or "I secretly fear ________." The most memorable of all asked me to finish "girls _______." I humbly replied, "Girls tell me I'm funny." Believe me, I got a chuckle or two out of the psychologist when he read my answer.

There is power in humor. A well told joke can instantly change moods from low to high, moving a person from a state of depression to elation within seconds. It is nearly impossible for me to remain angry or disappointed when I hear a stomach-jiggling joke. And yet, sometimes I find myself laughing at some, well, jokes questionable in their moral standard.  I do not think, however, it is improper for someone to dislike a joke. I do believe, however, that the moral standards that ought to be applied to evaluating jokes, puns, and humour insofar as not how much someone likes or dislikes a joke, but its effect upon their personal dignity.

G.K. Chesterton predicted, nearly a century ago, that, "If the modern world will not insist on having some sharp and definite moral law, capable of resisting the counter-attractions of art and humour, the modern world will simply be given over as a spoil to anybody who can manage to do a nasty thing in a nice way." It seldomly seems that contemporary comedians have a "clean" show. It seems as though comedians have found ways to use the f-word as every part of speech. I could not go one day in my high school without hearing a classmate utter a vulgar word. Maybe the world has been handed over as spoils? I hope not.

It used to be that vulgarity expressed extreme anger or outrageous displeasure. It used to be that it was social taboo to speak "cuss" or swear words. Men and women who blasphemed merited death in certain cultures. That, of course, is not the case these days. These days, popular songs such as "Boulevard of Broken Dreams" "You're Beautiful" "Empire State of Mind" "Not Afraid" "Love the Way You Lie" include vulgar, and easily remmovable improper language-- and yet remain popular and contemporary "classics", songs easily known by the mass public. Is this integrated vulgarity into pop society necessary? NO. Plainly, no. There is no excuse for vulgar or "dirty" language-- lest we reduce human beings to nothing more than animals farting out sounds from their mouths. Pop culture has integrated these thoughts of "acceptable language" to be equivalent in respect to a vulgar thought disguised by a popular icon.

There is an old saying, "Sow a thought, reap an action; sow an action; reap a habit; sow a habit, reap a character; sow a character reap a destiny." As popular culture sows the thought of introducing acceptable-vulgarity, it implicitly endorses anger. By endorsing anger, pop culture ought not be surprised at the multitude of violent crimes. Pop culture excuses the violent crimes through relative-subjectivism, or blames design or the environment. Rarely do individuals take remorseful and personal culpability directly related to their actions and intentions. That is the devil's lie-- we ought not be sorry for any wrong we commit-- we ought not feel bad, responsible, culpable, remorseful, or repentant. Content: that is his lie. Then what is the truth?

"I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me," articulates Jesus Christ. Jesus is the truth. How do we come to know truth? Through and by Him. Through prayer, adoration, the sacraments, and recognizing Christ's presence in each other-- "When two or more are gathered in My name, I am there." This is not a laughing matter. It is UNTIL you accept Christ in your life that you consciously or unconsciously desire Him. We all have a Jesus-sized hole in our human design.

As we laugh, let us remember-- if Jesus would be for "this joke", then I can be for it; if Jesus would be against "this joke", then I should be against it. Essentially the cheesy grade-school "WWJD." But it works. Plainly and simply. It requires a change of heart, change of lifestyle, change of language -- all metanoia. The tingle of a funny bone can never triumph the value of the heart, lest the value of our hearts decrease to zero. Remember, Jesus tells us to, "Love the Lord God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength and to love our neighbor as ourself." That's our punchline--a punchline of love.

Friday, October 29, 2010

Be A Dad: A Thoughtful Critique of Fr. Larry Richard's Article Relating Fatherhood to Family

           “You are going to die! … Isn’t that a nice thought?”[1] begins Fr. Larry Richards. Death motivates even the most stubborn and stagnant-hearted individuals. But in this case, Richards manipulates the deepest fear of the human race, death, as a catalyst for living out Christian fatherhood. The ultimatum of death’s reality, Richards implicitly articulates, should direct our attitude of life. With that in mind, a Christian father ought to especially live out Jesus’ command of love—Love one another as I have loved you. Love is the key that opens the lock to a faithful, wholesome, and life-giving marriage.
            Many men, however, fear the vulnerability which true love precipitates. Vulnerability comes from the Latin vulnero literally meaning “to wound.” Loving leaves room for hurt, pain, and intimate suffering—all of which are the inevitable “wounds.” But as Richards says, “You will never in your life regret that you told your wife…that you love [her] – never.”[2] In the end, reflecting on life, there will never be a thought of “I should not have loved.” We find that, interestingly enough, God tells us 365 times in Sacred Scripture, “Do not Be Afraid.” So then, how do we, as men, conquer this seemingly inherent fear to be intimate and vulnerable with others? Through love for God. We must be vulnerable with the Lord before we can be vulnerable with our wife.
            Loving and knowing God is not the same as knowing about Him. Memorizing Aquinas’ Cosmological Proofs or getting an “A” in this Christian Marriage class will not automatically reserve a spot for anyone in God’s Kingdom in heaven. We come to know God through spending time with God, just as how we come to know anyone in an intimate way. We must, as Fr. Larry Richards puts it, “Keep spending time with God until… you know God…”[3] God calls us, however, to a special relationship with Him—one that demands an intimacy unequivocally unrelated to any other human relationship. He is to be our Abba—our daddy—and we are to be His children. He is from Whom our model of Christian fatherhood should originate.
            Just as how Our Father loves wholly and unconditionally, so too ought we to love our wife and children. As it says in Ephesians, “Wives, be submissive to your husbands… Husbands, love your wives as Christ loved the Church” – this demand upon the husband requires a Christo-centric heart committed to agape—the Greek understanding of unconditional love. Fr. Larry Richards says, “Every day [you] need to be more concerned about [the other]. That is what marriage is about!”[4] The term sacrifice comes from the Latin sacra meaning “holy or sacred.” So literally by sacrificing oneself for the other, a husband imparts holiness upon his wife and himself and vice versa. This is the beauty of a Christian Marriage—seeing Jesus Christ in your spouse.[5] The husband, however, has a specific and distinct role in the family dynamic.
            The husband, comments Fr. Larry Richards, is to be the “spiritual leader” of the family.[6] As the spiritual leader, he is explicitly called to lay down his life for his family. And yet, Richards calls men of this age “spiritual wimps” [7] for not daily carrying their cross in the light of Jesus Christ—the Man for Others par excellence. They are to lead through prayer, by coming to know the Lord in an intimate relationship and guiding their family closer towards Christ. They are to lead by sacrifice, making holy their families by giving of themselves unconditionally. They are to lead by humility, by realizing the vast importance concerning their duty to love and serve their family. They are to lead by example, living a life worthy of being admired—even Richards admits, “Men, your kids…will want to become just like you.” [8]
            Simplicity assumes men fully understand holiness. Holiness, however, is not sprinkling incense, lighting candles, charismatically speaking in tongues, nor having grace-filled visions. Holiness comes from the Hebrew word qadosh meaning “to be set apart or distinct.” As men, we must pray distinctly, lead distinctly, and love distinctly—best accomplished through faithfulness to wife, children, and God. Lacking in holiness comes at a grave cost. Richards mentions, “If we [men] are not holy ourselves, then our families will not be holy”[9]—how true! To live in a family devoted to living an unadulterated, wholesome Christian Marriage will set apart the family from the rest of the world. We must, especially in this day in age, be Christ to the world. That is true holiness.
            “You are going to die…isn’t that a nice thought?”[10] Yet, that implicitly states we, as men, have life left to live. We hold in the palm of our hand the greatest gift the Lord could give us—the ability to love Him—and we best love Him by loving others with the gifts He has given. He has blessed us with the opportunity to lead a family by gracing us with evident holiness, unreserved sacrifice, humble leadership, and tender prayer. There is a holy, distinct confidence that the Lord of the universe has given us a powerful mission—Love one another as I have loved you—and that is the “catchphrase” of Christian Marriage. As Fr. Larry Richards guarantees, “[Love] will change your family. [Love] will change the world.”[11]
           


[1] Page 1
[2] Page 1
[3] Page 2
[4] Page 2
[5] Page 2
[6] Page 3
[7] Page 3
[8] Page 3
[9] Page 3
[10] Page 1
[11] Page 1